We Don’t Know The First Thing About Diversity

mhagandefaultMichael Hagan ’15

My headline is my thesis- bold claim, right? Providence College is one of many racially and culturally homogenous crossroads of people of privilege in the northeast. Privilege is an enormous spectrum unto itself, and it has various sources. Some privilege is a free gift, and some privilege must be fought for and earned. Privilege is not inherently advantageous. It can be a burden. It can be abused.

The phenomenon known as “white privilege” is, to our country’s shame, a thing. It is true that well over 76% of the Providence College student body has benefitted in varying degrees from it. We white folks tend to attract more friendly waves than suspicious glares from law enforcement and security personnel in public places. We can speak improperly, drive poorly, and receive public assistance; no one attributes these to our “whiteness.” Forty-three white men have served as President of the United States; not one of them has been accused of winning “just because he’s white.” From job interviews to airport security, from customer service to criminal justice – white privilege is real.

As established, privilege is not inherently advantageous. The conveniences that come with white privilege have, do, and will hurt us all no matter our race. Diversity initiatives at Providence College are how we seek to avert further damage from systematic injustices. We all too commonly think that the purpose of such initiatives is to compensate for past mistreatment. It’s not about reciprocity; it’s about the social vitality of this community. Until we realize that our goal must be greater than righting history’s wrongs, we don’t understand “diversity.” Diversity is not a gift from white people to minority populations; it is something that we must achieve together through concerted efforts. The Priory, the Office for Multicultural Activities, BMSA, and the Chief Diversity Officer might understand this, but until the student body does as well, Providence College does not know diversity.

We put our misunderstanding of diversity on display in our speech, behavior, and every so often in print. The article “Diversity: More than Skin Color” from this past week’s Cowl is such a display. From ignoring white privilege to relying on the outdated term “colored,” the article reflects an ingrained and reinforced misunderstanding. The use of the term “diverse” as though it can be properly applied to individual students (“This would not be outrageous if diverse students earned the scholarships”) reflects this misunderstanding. The student body is not made up of “diverse people” and “un-diverse people” as the author contends. The Providence College community is the subject of “diverse,” and only by a community can diversity be possessed. Diversity is something we must actively participate in to possess; to use a theologically loaded term, it has much in common with “communion” in this sense. We will be reluctant to participate in diversity if we do not understand it; once we understand, we would be foolish not to participate.

In this regard, I agree with the author from the Cowl because she applauds the emphasis on teaching diversity. Teaching diversity will hopefully compel students to shed misinformed beliefs like the ones she expounded last week. Teaching is so critical to diversity initiatives, because presently it is clear that we as a student body don’t know the first thing about diversity.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “We Don’t Know The First Thing About Diversity

  1. I am not offended by the article and I do not see it as a malicious attack on PC’s underrepresented students. However, I am still amazed that diversity in America is hot button topic. I mean come on, its 2013! As an underrepresented student (I am biracial) I do think we need to critique the diversity initiatives. It is almost too easy to sweep these things under the rug with dubious and feel good “solutions” without addressing the real issue. We need to educate one another and I will admit that regarding the topic, there are things that I am ignorant of. Yes, the term colored is old fashioned and even offensive but, we must examine the school’s use of the term. It is even stated in its diversity plan that one of its objectives is to “establish a target goal for students of color”. I hope I am more than just a colored student in the eyes of the school. It is more than our peers being ignorant of diversity, it is even our school and quite possibly the administrators who created the strategic plan. I will admit, I have my own biases and ignorances and I am open to anyone who will further enlighten me.

  2. my only critique of this very well written article is that it seems like the only reason why the Cowl author used the word “colored” was because it was used online on the school’s official diversity page and goals. I don’t think she was uninformed in using it, she was simply going along with what the school had already deemed appropriate

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s